



Pitch
b. 36
|
composition: Op. 25 No 6, Etude in G♯ minor
..
Same as in bar 4, in the main text we omit the superfluous category imprint: Editorial revisions; Source & stylistic information |
||||
b. 40
|
composition: Op. 25 No 6, Etude in G♯ minor
..
Based on the notation of FC, in this bar Chopin used in the manuscripts a more accurate notation than in the previous, similar places (c.f., e.g., bar 4) – apart from the first group of semiquavers, he wrote with notes also the second, together with the necessary accidentals. In spite of that, GE1 did not repeat the signs in the 2nd half of the bar, which was corrected only in GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||
b. 42
|
composition: Op. 25 No 6, Etude in G♯ minor
..
When publishing the Etude, Chopin envisaged c category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions; Corrections & alterations issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FED , Accompaniment changes , Annotations in FES , Authentic post-publication changes and variants , Annotations in FEJ |
||||
b. 42
|
composition: Op. 25 No 6, Etude in G♯ minor
..
FC has most probably f category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Inaccuracies in FC |
||||
b. 42
|
composition: Op. 25 No 6, Etude in G♯ minor
..
The natural lowering a category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals |