|
b. 17
|
composition: Op. 25 No 4, Etude in A minor
..
In EE1 there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE |
||||||||
|
b. 18
|
composition: Op. 25 No 4, Etude in A minor
..
Moving the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Scope of dynamic hairpins , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 19-22
|
composition: Op. 25 No 4, Etude in A minor
..
The varied accents – long over crotchets and short over quavers – are written in A. However, it must be stated that the difference is not obvious at first glance and was not reproduced in any of the remaining sources. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
||||||||
|
b. 20
|
composition: Op. 25 No 4, Etude in A minor category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 21
|
composition: Op. 25 No 4, Etude in A minor
..
The slur in FC was almost certainly added by Chopin, who added an analogous slur while proofreading FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE , Authentic corrections of FC |
before the last quaver in the upper voice in the R.H. This patent inaccuracy in this context – of the engraver or the person performing the base text – was corrected in 
below L.H. in 
