|
b. 37
|
composition: Op. 25 No 4, Etude in A minor
..
The missing g note on the 2nd quaver is certainly an oversight of the engraver of GE1. The error was corrected in GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||||||
|
b. 38
|
composition: Op. 25 No 4, Etude in A minor
..
Lack of staccato signs in A (→FE) is almost certainly a result of Chopin's distraction. Cf. bars 25-26. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in A |
|||||||||||
|
b. 39-40
|
composition: Op. 25 No 4, Etude in A minor
..
Same as in bars 9-10, Chopin added here two category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FC |
|||||||||||
|
b. 39-40
|
composition: Op. 25 No 4, Etude in A minor
..
The question of type of accents written here by Chopin in A (→FE) – short or long – see bars 9-10. The missing accent in FC (→GE) in bar 40 is certainly a mistake – perhaps the copyist was not sure how to interpret the impressively written long accent in A. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Errors of FC |
|||||||||||
|
b. 39
|
composition: Op. 25 No 4, Etude in A minor
..
It is hard to state how the difference in the slurring between FC (→GE) and A and the remaining sources was created. The copyist's error seems to be the most probable answer, yet it cannot be totally excluded that the slur, beginning in this bar and overlooked by the copyist, was added by Chopin. Independently from the way it was created, the version of FC did not raise Chopin's doubts when he was adding dynamic hairpins in this and further bars. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FC |
in 
