mUltimate Chopin

Op. 25 No 2, Etude in F minor

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 7

composition: Op. 25 No 2, Etude in F minor

Fingering written into FED

No teaching fingering
..

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FED

b. 7-8

composition: Op. 25 No 2, Etude in F minor

  in AT

  in AW

No signs in GC (→GE)

  in CDP & FE

  in EE
..

The missing   in GC (→GE) is probably the copyist's oversight. Among marginal differences in the range of signs in particular sources, only the shorter hairpins of AW may suggest a slightly different shaping of the nuance. In the main text, we give the hairpins on the basis of FE (and CDP).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Scope of dynamic hairpins , Errors of GC

b. 7

composition: Op. 25 No 2, Etude in F minor

..

AT, AW and CDP do not have here the  before the 5th (e2) quaver. In AW and CDP, the inaccuracy is also in bar 26, while in CDP also in bar 57. 

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Accidentals in different octaves , Errors of A , Errors of CDP

b. 8

composition: Op. 25 No 2, Etude in F minor

'2 1' written into FED

'4 3' written into FES

Our suggestion

No teaching fingering
..

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FED , Annotations in FES

b. 8

composition: Op. 25 No 2, Etude in F minor

a2 in AT, AW, CDP, GC (→GE), FE & EE2 (→EE3)

b2 in EE1
..

The version of EE1 is almost certainly erroneous.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE