Issues : EE revisions
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next »
|
b. 15
|
composition: Op. 25 No 2, Etude in F minor
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||
|
b. 25
|
composition: Op. 25 No 2, Etude in F minor
..
In GC (→GE1), FE and EE1 there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors in EE , Omissions to cancel alteration , GE revisions , Errors of GC |
||||||
|
b. 43-47
|
composition: Op. 25 No 2, Etude in F minor
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||
|
b. 56
|
composition: Op. 25 No 2, Etude in F minor
..
The notation of this bar is erroneous or inaccurate in the majority of the sources. Most probably, Chopin, writing this fragment in [A] for the third time (after analogous bars 6 and 25), had already such a strong correlation of the notes with the proper sound that he did not notice the missing
The cautionary category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors in EE , Omissions to cancel alteration , Errors in GE , GE revisions , Errors of A , Errors of GC |
||||||
|
b. 61
|
composition: Op. 25 No 2, Etude in F minor
..
In GE and EE3 there is a cautionary category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
returning b
1. This characteristic for Chopin error was corrected in later sources; 
before the 4th quaver. Cancelling this alteration was, as usual, obvious, hence it was not marked even when the composer would correct the notation of this bar in - « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next »