![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Accidentals in different octaves
b. 15
|
composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor
..
A (→FE→EE1) has no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Accidentals in different octaves |
|
b. 30
|
composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor
..
In FE1 there is no
In the main text we omit the superfluous category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Accidentals in different octaves , Cautionary accidentals |
|
b. 31
|
composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor
..
A (→FE→GE1) has no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in A |
|
b. 33
|
composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor
..
The notation of accidentals in the R.H. arpeggio is not fully compliant with rules of the orthography. Chopin needlessly repeated category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals , Inaccuracies in A |
|
b. 63
|
composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor
..
A (→FE→EE1) has no category imprint: issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Accidentals in different octaves , Errors in EE , GE revisions |