Issues : EE revisions
|
b. 107
|
composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor
..
FE (→GE1) omitted the slur in the L.H. It is undoubtedly an engraver's inaccuracy. Cf. the neighbouring note. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
|||||||
|
b. 109
|
composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor
..
FE overlooked the slur in the L.H. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
|||||||
|
b. 119
|
composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor
..
A (→FE→EE1) has no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Accidentals in different octaves , Errors in EE , GE revisions |
|||||||
|
b. 129
|
composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor
..
Leaving the staccato dots in FE (→EE) is, according to us, a result of an inaccurately performed proofreading, whose aim was – same as in analogous bar 25 – to replace dots with accents. The dots were not included in GE, probably after comparison with bar 25. The absence of the accent in the R.H. is certainly an oversight of GE3 (→GE4). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE |
|||||||
|
b. 137
|
composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor
..
The absence of the tie of g category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
rising g
1 to g1 on 4th L.H. quaver, like in other occurences of this bar. The obvious oversight was corrected in 
