Issues : Inaccuracies in FE
b. 121-122
|
composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor
..
The notation with no additional crotchet stems to the 2nd and 4th quavers is probably inaccurate. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
||||||||
b. 122-123
|
composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor
..
The hairpins were inaccurately recreated in FE (→EE), whereas in GE1 they were most probably overlooked. In the subsequent GE the sign was added on the basis of analogous bars 18-19. In the main text we give the hairpins of A. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Scope of dynamic hairpins , Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 129
|
composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor
..
Leaving the staccato dots in FE (→EE) is, according to us, a result of an inaccurately performed proofreading, whose aim was – same as in analogous bar 25 – to replace dots with accents. The dots were not included in GE, probably after comparison with bar 25. The absence of the accent in the R.H. is certainly an oversight of GE3 (→GE4). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE |
||||||||
b. 131
|
composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
||||||||
b. 133-135
|
composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE |