![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Inaccuracies in FE
b. 60
|
composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor
..
The absence of category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
|||||||||
b. 65-66
|
composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor
..
The notation with no additional crotchet stems to 2nd and 4th quavers is probably inaccurate. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
|||||||||
b. 66-67
|
composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor
..
In the main text we give category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
|||||||||
b. 68
|
composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor
..
In the main text we give a slur introduced by Chopin in the FE1's proofreading in the analogous bar 124. The identical slur in EE and later GE is a revision based on the same observation. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||
b. 68
|
composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor
..
FE (→GE1) omitted the L.H. slur. The inaccuracy is certainly a result of a careless correction. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , Errors resulting from corrections , GE revisions |