Issues : Authentic corrections of FE
|
b. 174
|
composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor
..
In FE the oversight of the clearly written slur in A seems to be a mistake. However, taking into account the recitative and culminant character of this motif, one cannot exclude the deletion of the slur by Chopin in the proofreading of FE1. In GE and EE the slur was added probably after analogy with the previous bars. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Errors in FE , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||
|
b. 175
|
composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor
..
A separate slur for the L.H. was added in the proofreading of FE1, most probably by Chopin. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||
|
b. 175
|
composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor
..
It is hard to state whether the simplified notation of the part of the R.H. in FE (→GE,EE) resulted from Chopin's proofreading or the engraver's inaccuracy. The first of these possibilities is indicated by the addition of the lento indication in FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||
|
b. 175
|
composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor
..
The lento indication is undoubtedly a Chopin addition in the proofreading of FE1. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
