data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
b. 37
|
composition: Op. 26 No 1, Polonaise in C♯ minor
..
In FE (→GE1,EE) the engraver overlooked the slur for the R.H. The overlooked slur was added by the reviser of GE2 (→GE3→GE4→GE5), probably after the notation in analogous bar 12. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , GE revisions |
||||||
b. 37
|
composition: Op. 26 No 1, Polonaise in C♯ minor
..
GE3 (→GE4→GE5) overlooked the additional stem and dot, extending the b category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||
b. 37
|
composition: Op. 26 No 1, Polonaise in C♯ minor
..
The slur was added by Chopin in the proofreading of FE1. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||
b. 38
|
composition: Op. 26 No 1, Polonaise in C♯ minor
..
The lack of slur to the bottom voice of the R.H. is almost certainly an arbitrary decision of the engraver of FE1, who, aiming at a faithful reproduction of the graphic layout of A (the dots and slur over the notes, between the R.H. voices), was not able to fit the slur in a legible manner. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
||||||
b. 38
|
composition: Op. 26 No 1, Polonaise in C♯ minor
..
The absence of the last staccato dot for the bottom voice of the R.H. is undoubtedly a result of an inaccuracy of the engraver of GE1. In turn, the oversight of all dots in GE2 (→GE3→GE4→GE5) is probably a revision. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |