b. 37
|
composition: Op. 26 No 1, Polonaise in C♯ minor
..
In FE (→GE1,EE) the engraver overlooked the slur for the R.H. The overlooked slur was added by the reviser of GE2 (→GE3→GE4→GE5), probably after the notation in analogous bar 12. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , GE revisions |
||||||
b. 37
|
composition: Op. 26 No 1, Polonaise in C♯ minor
..
GE3 (→GE4→GE5) overlooked the additional stem and dot, extending the b1 quaver, probably due to inattention. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||
b. 37
|
composition: Op. 26 No 1, Polonaise in C♯ minor
..
The slur was added by Chopin in the proofreading of FE1. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||
b. 38
|
composition: Op. 26 No 1, Polonaise in C♯ minor
..
The lack of slur to the bottom voice of the R.H. is almost certainly an arbitrary decision of the engraver of FE1, who, aiming at a faithful reproduction of the graphic layout of A (the dots and slur over the notes, between the R.H. voices), was not able to fit the slur in a legible manner. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
||||||
b. 38
|
composition: Op. 26 No 1, Polonaise in C♯ minor
..
The absence of the last staccato dot for the bottom voice of the R.H. is undoubtedly a result of an inaccuracy of the engraver of GE1. In turn, the oversight of all dots in GE2 (→GE3→GE4→GE5) is probably a revision. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |