Slurs
|
b. 26
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
Taking into account the slurs in the adjacent bars, lack of the slur in this place must be considered as inaccuracy of notation. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||||||||
|
b. 27-28
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
In AI there are no articulation and phrasing slurs until bar 34. The broken slur of EE is probably a result of routine interpretation of the notation of FE (→GE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE inaccuracies |
|||||||||
|
b. 29-30
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
The slurs in FE (→GE,EE) are broken, yet according to us, it is probably an inaccuracy in the reproduction of Chopin's intention – in FE bar 30 opens a new line of the text, which, on a number of occasions, led to errors and inaccuracies in the notation of slurs. category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Uncertain slur continuation |
|||||||||
|
b. 29-30
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
Lack of the slur in bar 30 in FE (→EE2,GE1→GE1a) must be regarded an inaccuracy, presumably an oversight of the engraver – slurs encompass remaining similar motives in the discussed bars. The lack of the 2nd slur in bar 29 in GE3 is undoubtedly an engraver's error. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||||
|
b. 30-32
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
category imprint: Differences between sources |
