data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
b. 53-61
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
According to us, the arpeggio performance of the tenth chords in bars 53 and 61 remains beyond any doubts – see bar 11. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
||||||
b. 54
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
A possible error of the engraver of FE (→GE,EE) is indicated by the repeated category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in FE , fz – f |
||||||
b. 54
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
In the main text we suggest to add a wedge after the authentic mark in analogous bar 4. The wedge was already added in GE and EE3 (→EE4). category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
||||||
b. 60
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||
b. 61
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
Same as in bar 11, the version of AI had to be also in [A], as there are visible traces of its deletion in FE. Similarly in bars 3 and 53. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FE |