b. 49
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
In AI this bar is briefly marked as repetition of the previous one, while in the part of the R.H. there is a last, different group of semiquavers. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Abbreviated notation of A |
|||||
b. 50
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
Chopin most probably added the semiquavers referring to the beginning of the Etude still in [A]. See also the change at the beginning of bar 51. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |
|||||
b. 50
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
In the last group of semiquavers, in the place where FE (→GE,EE) has a b1, in AI there is a c2. By introducing this clearly justified correction, Chopin did not check its result precisely – in FE (→GE1→GE1a,EE) there is no before c2, still necessary despite the change of the previous note from c2 to b1. This patent oversight was corrected in GE2 (→GE3→GE4→GE5). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Errors in FE , Omissions to cancel alteration , GE revisions , Enharmonic corrections |
|||||
b. 51
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
The fingering in EE was added by Fontana. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||
b. 51
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
One can ponder whether the mark written in AI could be applied in the clearly changed version of FE (→GE,EE). According to us, it cannot be excluded, yet in the main text we leave the version of the editions without additions. category imprint: Differences between sources |