b. 74
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
In GE3 the returning e2 on the 5th semiquaver of the bar was overlooked. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
||||||||
b. 75
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
Lack of the returning g2 in GE may reveal the fact that the sign was not added until the last proofreading of FE (→EE). The sharp became necessary here due to enharmonic changes in the notation of the previous group. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors resulting from corrections , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
b. 75
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
In AI the first 3 semiquavers in the 2nd half of the bar are written as f2-g2-f2 in the R.H. and f1-f1-f1 in the L.H. Chopin changed the notation in a proofreading of FE (→GE,EE). However, he left the sharps before f1 and f2 at the beginning of the last semiquaver group, superfluous after the change. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions; Corrections & alterations issues: Enharmonic corrections , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
b. 75-77
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
The fingering of EE is an addition by Fontana. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||||
b. 79-80
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
In the main text we give the fingering of FE (→GE,EE). It develops the indications written in AI, which are less detailed, yet unambiguous. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |