b. 26
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
in FE (→GE,EE) is clearly the engraver's mistake here. It is revealed by in the analogous situation in the previous bar and by a number of other obvious examples of distortion of this mark (see, e.g., the note to bars 16-18). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , fz – f |
||||||
b. 26
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
AI has a g1 as the 11th semiquaver, otherwise written with a superfluous . Chopin had to then change it into a g1, which is featured in FE (→EE). The fact of not considering this change in GE – unless it is a common mistake of the engraver – may reveal that it was not introduced until the last proofreading of FE. In GE4 (→GE5) the was deleted, unnecessary in the version with g1 (together with the equally superfluous before a1 on the penultimate semiquaver). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||
b. 26
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
In AI and FE (→EE2) there is no before the upper note of the octave (b2). This patent – and typical – inaccuracy of Chopin's notation was corrected in GE and EE3 (→EE4). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Errors of A |
||||||
b. 26
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
There are no naturals before the B-b octave in AI. It is a patent inaccuracy. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Accidentals in different octaves |
||||||
b. 26
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
In EE Fontana added a fingering modelled on the previous bar. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |