|
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
The indications of AI were changed in the version prepared for print, certainly with the participation of Chopin. Therefore, in the main text we give the version of FE (→EE). However, some of its elements can raise certain doubts, particularly the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Errors in GE , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||||||
|
b. 9
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
Chopin changed the first quaver in this bar a few times. In AI one can still see the deleted C category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |
|||||||||||||
|
b. 9-10
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
It is possible that at the time of writing AI, Chopin considered the slurs in bar 9 as valid also later, in bars 10-11. In the main text we give the later and fuller slurring of FE (→GE,EE). category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||||||||
|
b. 9-11
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
The hairpins of AI, leading to category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , EE inaccuracies |
|||||||||||||
|
b. 9
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
In the version prepared for print Chopin resigned from g category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |
in 
in 
-c
in bars 10-11 in 
in bar 11, is an earlier concept of dynamic indications. In the main text we stick to the version of 
