b. 11
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
We suggest to add an accent after the sign in analogous bar 61. In similar contexts, the crotchets at the end of bar are always accentuated – cf. bars 16, 18, 20, 22 and 25-26. The addition – probably on the same basis – was introduced already in EE3 (→EE4) and GE4 (→GE5). category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
|||||||||||
b. 11
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
in AI – together with in bar 12 – is certainly an element of the original concept of dynamic indications of the Etude. category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||||||
b. 12
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
There is no fingering in AI. category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||||||
b. 12
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
The mark in AI is clearly valid from the beginning of the bar. In turn, in FE (→GE,EE2), apart from the literal reading, can be interpreted in several ways, e.g., as valid in this place or – which is more plausible – as valid from the beginning of the bar. In the main text we propose the latter, being the resultant of both source notations (Cf. also analogous bar 62). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Centrally placed marks |
|||||||||||
b. 12
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
In AI there is no slur in this bar. category imprint: Differences between sources |