data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
The main text comes from FE (→EE). Lack of the last accent in GE may be a common error, however, it can also prove that the sign was added only in the latest proofreading of FE. In turn, the reason of proofreading could have been a distortion of the long accent on the last quaver in the bar by the engraver of FE (such a sign is visible in AI) – cf. e.g. the Etude in A minor, No. 2, bar 8. These kind of doubts are not raised by the oversight of in this place, as it fits into a more general tendency of reducing the number of these indications in the printed version of the Etudes.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations
issues: Inaccuracies in FE, Errors in GE, Authentic corrections of FE
notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins