|
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor
..
In A, the difference in notation of the two R.H. accents in this bar is very pronounced. Nevertheless, the second one - the long one - was in GE (→FE→EE) reproduced as a short one. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE |
|||||||
|
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor
..
We give the precise notation of A, which later underwent gradual distortions in GE1 and FE (→EE): first the omission of the dot and moving of the accent, then lowering of the curved line. As a result, in FE (→EE) the note a is sustained, which almost certainly goes against Chopin's intentions, as changes did not have the nature of corrections at any stage category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
|||||||
|
b. 9
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor
..
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||||
|
b. 9-12
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor
..
FES has pencil marks in every one of those bars, yet their meaning is difficult to decipher. category imprint: Source & stylistic information |
|||||||
|
b. 10
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor
..
The lack of a staccato dot under G in EE is probably due to the engraver's omission. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE inaccuracies |
was added before c1.
