|
b. 49-50
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor
..
The pedalling added in FE (→EE) probably results from Chopin's correction. As for the placement of category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||
|
b. 49
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor
..
The sign added in FES may be interpreted as a fingering numeral 1. However, the editors do not find this reading obvious, as the use of any other finger would be so unnatural that it is actually hard to envisage the need for indicating the use of the 1st finger here. category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||||
|
b. 49-50
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor
category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccurate slurs in A , GE revisions |
|||||||||
|
b. 49
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor
..
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||||||
|
b. 50
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor
..
The long accent in A is – unlike in analogous bars – quite clear here. Making it resemble the accents appearing in similar phrases is not appropriate in this case because of differences in texture and the resulting sound shape of the return of the Mazurka's main theme. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE |
marks, it stays in line with the pedalling of other analogous bars in those editions. In our opinion, compliance with the pedalling of the entire Mazurka is more important when it comes to the interpretation of that correction than the very fact of placing the marks under the 3rd crotchet. Therefore in our main text we suggest the pedalling that complies with the marks taken from 
was added before d1.
