|
b. 54-55
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor
..
The mark category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
|||
|
b. 54-56
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor
..
In A, the end of the slur was drawn inaccurately – category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness issues: Inaccurate slurs in A |
|||
|
b. 55
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor
..
In A the left hand slur reaches above the rest in the following bar. It is just one example of the flourish with which Chopin wrote many slurs in this Mazurka. category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: Inaccurate slurs in A |
|||
|
b. 55
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor
..
The staccato mark written in A was overlooked in GE1 (→FE→EE). The inaccuracy was corrected in GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |
|||
|
b. 55
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor
..
The allocation of the accent to one hand does not result from the notation of A. In GE (→FE) it was clearly assigned to the left hand. The notation of EE seems to be closer to A. category imprint: Differences between sources |
in 
. Leading the slur to the grace note is inadmissible in this context. If one were to take into account the extent of the L.H. slur, one could conclude that the R.H. slur does not go beyond bar 55 either. Still, it seems more probable that what Chopin had in mind was a slur similar to that from bars 6-8. This is how his intention was understood in 
