Issues : Authentic corrections of FE
|
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 10 No 9, Etude in F minor
..
A includes the indication rittenuto (sic!). In the main text we give ritard., which could be a result of Chopin's proofreading of FE (→GE,EE). In AI there are no indications in bars 8-9. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of A , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||
|
b. 14-16
|
composition: Op. 10 No 9, Etude in F minor
..
The slur of A gradually fades due to the ending ink, hence it is uncertain where it was supposed to end, according to Chopin. The short slur of AI is probably fragmented (cf. bars 2-4). In the main text, we give the unambiguous slur of FE (→GE,EE), which could have been proofread by Chopin. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||
|
b. 16
|
composition: Op. 10 No 9, Etude in F minor category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||
|
b. 17-19
|
composition: Op. 10 No 9, Etude in F minor
..
We give the fingering added by Chopin in a proofreading of FE (→GE). In EE3 the digits in bar 17 were omitted, which was only partially and erroneously corrected in EE4. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||
|
b. 17-26
|
composition: Op. 10 No 9, Etude in F minor
..
Chopin added the entire pedalling in this section of the Etude while proofreading FE (→GE,EE). See also bars 22-23, 29-32 and 33-36. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
