Slurs
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »
b. 9-16
|
composition: Op. 10 No 9, Etude in F minor
..
The slurs in these bars – despite being justified from the point of view of the performance – do not appear in the sources controlled by Chopin in terms of publication (A, FE). We do not include them in the main text. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
b. 10-12
|
composition: Op. 10 No 9, Etude in F minor
..
The shorter slur of AI (written in bars 3-4) certainly does not reflect Chopin's complete intention in terms of slurring. We give the unambiguous slur of A (→FE→GE,EE). category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
b. 14-16
|
composition: Op. 10 No 9, Etude in F minor
..
The slur of A gradually fades due to the ending ink, hence it is uncertain where it was supposed to end, according to Chopin. The short slur of AI is probably fragmented (cf. bars 2-4). In the main text, we give the unambiguous slur of FE (→GE,EE), which could have been proofread by Chopin. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
b. 17-20
|
composition: Op. 10 No 9, Etude in F minor
..
The slur of A (→FE→GE,EE), beginning in the 2nd bar of a new phrase, was completed by Chopin in FED. We consider this addition as an improvement of notation and adopt it to the main text. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FED , Inaccurate slurs in A |
||||||||
b. 29
|
composition: Op. 10 No 9, Etude in F minor
..
In bar 29 Chopin repeated in A the simplified notation of AI, which in the light of the more accurate notation of the next bars must be considered as an oversight. While proofreading FE (→GE,EE), the composer added the slurs and dots. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »