![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Inaccuracies in FE
b. 123-124
|
composition: Op. 38, Ballade in F major
..
Similarly to the slur, the moment where the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Scope of dynamic hairpins , Errors in EE , Inaccuracies in GC |
|||||||||||
b. 131
|
composition: Op. 38, Ballade in F major
..
The lack of the arpeggio sign is most probably an oversight by the engraver of FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
|||||||||||
b. 132-133
|
composition: Op. 38, Ballade in F major
..
All versions of dynamic indications differing from the one written in A result from an inaccurate reproduction of the notation of the autograph:
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , EE inaccuracies |
|||||||||||
b. 134
|
composition: Op. 38, Ballade in F major
..
In the 1st R.H. chord, GE1 did not include the cautionary naturals next to a1 and a2 written in A (→EE,GC). The naturals were added in GE2 (→GE3). FE omitted only the bottom category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals |
|||||||||||
b. 136
|
composition: Op. 38, Ballade in F major
..
It is not entirely clear what staccato marks were intened by Chopin in this bar. They resemble dots In A despite being bigger than usual – possibly Chopin emboldened them to make them better visible, or changed wedges for dots. FE read them as wedges (except for the omitted L.H. mark), GC and EE – as dots (in the copy the L.H. mark was omitted, and reinstated in GE. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Wedges , Inaccuracies in GC |