A
compare
in 
All versions of dynamic indications differing from the one written in A result from an inaccurate reproduction of the notation of the autograph:
- shift of the cresc. indication in GC, slightly intensified in GE, is an inaccuracy that was probably aimed at keeping the notation transparent. Its possible influence on the performance seems to be marginal.
- the changes introduced in EE (forced by the start of a new line), and particularly the ones in FE, in which the
hairpin was shortened and the cresc. indication was omitted, contribute to a more serious change of the layout.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: Inaccuracies in FE, EE inaccuracies
notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins