![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : GE revisions
b. 62-63
|
composition: Op. 38, Ballade in F major category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccurate slurs in A , Embracing slurs , GE revisions |
|||||||||||
b. 64-67
|
composition: Op. 38, Ballade in F major
..
In both manuscripts a new line of text starts from bar 65, resulting in inaccurate or erroneous notation of L.H. slurs. In A the end of slur in bar 64 clearly indicates continuation which is not confirmed by the beginning of slur in bar 65. In GC the slur ends in bar 64 and is not continued in the subsequent bars. The engraver of FE was not mislead by the inaccuracy of A. However, it probably caused an error in EE which starts a new slur from a new line (from bar 66, closely resembling bar 65 beginning a new line in A). GE amended the GC version by adding separate, bar-long slurs in bars 65-67 (probably generalising the slur written in GC in bar 68). category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccurate slurs in A , GE revisions , Errors of GC , Uncertain slur continuation |
|||||||||||
b. 64
|
composition: Op. 38, Ballade in F major
..
In all editions, small discrepancies notwithstanding, the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Scope of dynamic hairpins , GE revisions , FE revisions |
|||||||||||
b. 68-69
|
composition: Op. 38, Ballade in F major
..
In A (→GC,FE1→FE2) there are no accidentals before the last chord in bar 68 and in the entire bar 69. Moreover, in both previous FE there are no flats before two topmost notes of the chord at the beginning of bar 68 (d category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , FE revisions |
|||||||||||
b. 69
|
composition: Op. 38, Ballade in F major
..
The octave in FE is most probably a result of an oversight of the engraver of FE1, although the missing completion of the middle note in later proofreadings may be perplexing. It is even more puzzling considering the fact that both in FE2 and in FE3 corrections were made in this bar and on this stave – in FE2 it was the octave sign that was corrected, while FE3 added flats lowering e2(3) to e category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , FE revisions |