Issues : EE revisions
b. 58-59
|
composition: Op. 38, Ballade in F major
..
The combined slur in EE results most likely from a mistake or misunderstanding of the script of A. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , EE inaccuracies |
||||||||
b. 62-63
|
composition: Op. 38, Ballade in F major category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccurate slurs in A , Embracing slurs , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 64-67
|
composition: Op. 38, Ballade in F major
..
GC (→GE) and FE overlook the slurs in the R.H. in bars 64-67 (and further). In EE the slur was divided in the middle of bar 67, probably analogously to the authentic slurring in bar 65. In the main text we give the slurring of A. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors of GC |
||||||||
b. 64
|
composition: Op. 38, Ballade in F major
..
In all editions, small discrepancies notwithstanding, the hairpin is distinctly shorter than in manuscripts. It attests, in our opinion, to the routine approach of engravers, who tried to adjust the range of the sign to elements of the notation related to the rhythmical structure, like notes or bars. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Scope of dynamic hairpins , GE revisions , FE revisions |
||||||||
b. 65
|
composition: Op. 38, Ballade in F major
..
Before the first chord, in all sources an superfluous cautionary occurs next to e1. We omit it in the main text, adding a cautionary before c1, and a before b1 instead. The latter was added already in EE. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Cautionary accidentals |