data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
In A the 2nd part of the bar in the R.H. was deleted and rewritten next to the stave. The ties sustaining d2-a
2 are in the deleted part of the bar, while in the part which was rewritten there is only a tie sustaining a
2. As a result of this ambiguous notation, in GC (→GE) only the tie to a
2 was copied. In FE and EE the ambiguous notation of A was interpreted, according to us, correctly, preserving both ties.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information
issues: Deletions in A, Inaccuracies in GC
notation: Slurs