b. 277-280
|
composition: Op. 42, Waltz in A♭ major category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FE , Authentic corrections of EE |
||||||||
b. 280
|
composition: Op. 42, Waltz in A♭ major
..
In FE1 the sign was placed after the 2nd crotchet, which may be a result of a misinterpretation of Chopin's notation by the engraver – cf. three preceding bars. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
b. 281
|
composition: Op. 42, Waltz in A♭ major
..
Both source versions of the 4th quaver may be authentic, yet each of them may be erroneous:
According to us, there are a few more arguments for a single note in this place, yet they are not conclusive. Therefore, in the main text we suggest a variant solution. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Authentic corrections of EE |
||||||||
b. 281
|
composition: Op. 42, Waltz in A♭ major
..
The last mark in the Waltz was added by Chopin in FE and EE. The composer also wrote it into FEG (as a unique pedal marking), but the mark was not included in GE. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Errors in GE , Authentic corrections of FE , Authentic corrections of GE , Authentic corrections of EE |
||||||||
b. 282
|
composition: Op. 42, Waltz in A♭ major
..
The version of GE2 (→GE3) is most probably revised – c3 on the 4th quaver was removed in order to homogenise the bar with the previous one. The version could have been intended by Chopin if we were to admit that the third in this place is an error of the engraver and that Chopin did not pay attention to it neither in FEG nor in the proofreading of FE and base text to EE and the pupils' copies. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |