Rhythm
b. 15
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major
..
In GE3 there are no crotchet stems, extending the bass notes G and c. The mistake was corrected in GE4 (→GE5). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||||
b. 18-19
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major
..
Omission of extensions of some of the bass notes is most probably a result of the engraver's inattention or of a misinterpretation of the notation (Chopin simplified notation is formally erroneous, as the rhythmic values of these crotchets do not fit in the bar). Chopin used a similar notation also in bars 20 and 71-76. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
|||||||||
b. 20
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major
..
Same as in bars 18-19, we consider the lack of extensions the E note in FE (→GE,EE) as an inaccuracy. In the main text we change the second crotchet for a quaver, as the hold to the next bar is already written with a tie. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
|||||||||
b. 21
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major
..
The line written – most probably by Chopin – in FED indicates the intended by composer simultaneous beginning of grace notes with the e-g third. category imprint: Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FED , Synchronization markings |
|||||||||
b. 22-28
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major
..
The version of the 2nd half of bars 22, 24, 26 and 28, written in AI, was simplified by Chopin already at the stage of writing A (→FE→GE,EE). category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |