Issues : EE revisions

b. 52

composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major

No slurs in AI & FE (→EE2)

Slur in A

Two slurs in GE & EE3 (→EE4)

..

In A Chopin overlooked one of the slurs in the L.H. (in AI there are no slurs in this fragment at all). The engraver of FE (→EE2) omitted the previous slur too. In the remaining editions these patent inaccuracies were corrected.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in A

b. 53-57

composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major

No fingering in AI & A (→FEGE)

Fingering in EE

..

The fingering of EE is an addition of Fontana. See also bars 53-54.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions

b. 55-56

composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major

Tie to f1 in AI, A & EE3 (→EE4)

No tie in FE (→GE,EE2)

..

Lack of the tie of f1 is most probably a result of inattention of the engraver of FE (→GE,EE2). The tie is present in both autographs, it was also added in EE3 (→EE4). Cf. bar 56.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE

b. 55

composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major

e1 in AI, A, FE2, GE1a (→GE2GE3GE4GE5) & EE4

d1 in FE1 (→GE1,EE2EE3)

..

d1 as the 4th semiquaver of the bottom voice in the R.H. is a patent error of FE1 (→GE1,EE2EE3).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE

b. 56-57

composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major

Slurs in A

Slur in FE (→GE1GE1a) & EE3

Slurs in GE2 (→GE3GE4GE5) & EE4

..

In bar 56 the earlier start of the slur in FE (→GE,EE; overlooked in EE2) seems to be an inaccuracy of the engraver, in spite of the fact that it is compatible with – according to us, apparently – lack of tie of f1. In turn, lack of the slur in bar 57 in FE (→GE1GE1aGE2GE3) is almost certainly a mistake.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors in EE , GE revisions