Pitch
|
b. 8-9
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major
..
Already at the stage of writing A, Chopin withdrew from the original version of the ending of the 1st eight-bar section, written in AI. However, it was only in FE (→GE,EE) that he gave the final shape to the performance indications of this fragment. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |
||||||||
|
b. 13
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major
..
The authenticity of the proofreading of FE (→GE,EE) does not raise any doubts, yet the accuracy of interpretation of the type of accent written by Chopin does. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
|
b. 15
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major
..
The c category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |
||||||||
|
b. 27
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major
..
The characteristic error of GE3 (→GE4) was corrected only in GE5 (at the same time, committing a rhythmic error). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Terzverschreibung error |
||||||||
|
b. 31
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major
..
There are no reasons to question Chopin provenience of the naturals added in FED. At the same time, however, one cannot consider this change to express Chopin's final intention, as in the remaining preserved pupils' copies, the composer did not mark it. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |
2 note in the version of 
. It is generally the same melodic idea, underpinning the subsequent Etude.
