Slurs
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 10 No 7, Etude in C major
..
According to us, separating the accented a note from the following quavers is unnatural in terms of both articulation and phrasing. It is confirmed by the slurring of similar bars 2, 5-6, 34-35 and 38-39 – a and g are combined with a slur in five out of seven places in A and in all seven in FE. Therefore, in the main text we suggest a slur beginning already from the 3rd quaver in the bar. category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Inaccurate slurs in A |
||||||||
b. 2
|
composition: Op. 10 No 7, Etude in C major category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE |
||||||||
b. 2-3
|
composition: Op. 10 No 7, Etude in C major
..
Initially, the slur of A in bar 2 ended on the last note in this bar (same as in bar 1). Chopin, while adding the slur in bar 3, ensured that it is added to the previous one, which can be considered as a template for all similar situations. category imprint: Corrections & alterations issues: Corrections in A |
||||||||
b. 3-4
|
composition: Op. 10 No 7, Etude in C major
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
b. 5-14
|
composition: Op. 10 No 7, Etude in C major
..
The whole-bar long slurs of EE are an arbitrary addition of the reviser who simply copied the authentic slurs from bars 1-4. The revision includes bars 5-11 in EE3 and in EE4 also bars 12-14. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |