Verbal indications
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 10 No 6, Etude in E♭ minor
..
In the main text we give the title and dedication in the undoubtedly authentic version adopted in FE. The extensions of both the title (in GE and EE) and the dedication (in EE) most probably come from the editors. See the Etude in C major, No. 1, bar 1. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Dedications , GE revisions |
||||||||||||||||
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 10 No 6, Etude in E♭ minor
..
The tempo indication, together with the metronome marking, was added by Chopin in a proofreading of FE (→GE,EE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||||||||||
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 10 No 6, Etude in E♭ minor
..
Lack of the indication in GE is probably a result of an oversight of the edition's engraver. It is less plausible, although it cannot be excluded, that the indication was omitted and then added in FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
||||||||||||||||
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 10 No 6, Etude in E♭ minor
..
The legatissimo indication is written in A in an abbreviated form – legatiss. We give the development of the abbreviation used in FE (→GE,EE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||||||||||
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 10 No 6, Etude in E♭ minor
..
In the main text we put cresc. over the part of the R.H., in accordance with A. In the editions it was placed between the staves, which in this case makes no big difference, as the part of the L.H. is also to be performed crescendo. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE |