Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 23

composition: Op. 10 No 6, Etude in E♭ minor

Accent in A

No mark in FE (→GE,EE)

A, interpretation suggested by the editors

..

The accent of A, perhaps accidentally omitted in the editions, may either be assigned to the R.H. (our main text) or to the left one.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in FE

b. 23

composition: Op. 10 No 6, Etude in E♭ minor

..

In the chord in the middle of the bar, Chopin overlooked the  returning in A. However, two notes later he added a cautionary natural before (arranged a little bit too high).

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Omissions to cancel alteration , Errors of A , Authentic corrections of FE , Accidental below/above the note , Last key signature sign

b. 23-24

composition: Op. 10 No 6, Etude in E♭ minor

Slur in A

No slur in FE (→GE,EE2)

Slur in EE3 (→EE4)

..

Lack of the slur in FE (→GE,EE2) is most probably accidental. In EE3 (→EE4) a slur embracing two bars was added, which is hard to contest.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE

b. 23

composition: Op. 10 No 6, Etude in E♭ minor

No sign in A (→FEGE,EE)

Possible reading of FED

..

The unclear mark visible in FED may be a fingering digit ('1') or an indication to perform f by the left hand.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FED

b. 24

composition: Op. 10 No 6, Etude in E♭ minor

 in A

FE (→EE,GE1GE2GE3GE4)

 in GE5

..

In the main text we give the hairpins after A. In FE (→GE,EE) they were aligned to the third of the upper voice, which most probably was a manner of the engraver of FE. In GE5 the direction of the mark was reversed.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Sign reversal