b. 55-56
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
..
Chopin added the cresc. indication in a proofreading of FE. Both in GE and in EE the word crescendo was divided into syllables. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||||||
b. 55-60
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
..
Chopin added the pedalling in a proofreading of FE (→GE,EE). The omitted mark in FE at the end of bar 59 was added in GE and EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||||||
b. 55-56
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
..
It does not seem possible that the accents of A, clearly falling on the 3rd quaver in both bars, took the form they have in FE due to the engraver's inaccuracy. Therefore, we consider the version of FE as an expression of Chopin's latest intention (despite the difference in length we consider both signs as long accents, as it was interpreted in EE). In GE the signs were given the form of short hairpins, which in this context is generally equal to long accents. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||||||
b. 56
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
..
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||||||
b. 56
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
..
In EE2 the raising d1 to d1 was omitted. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE |