b. 60
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
..
The pedalling of the 2nd half of the bar was added in a proofreading of FE (→EE). In GE1 the mark at the end of bar 60 is missing, which was corrected in GE2, yet in GE3 (→GE4→GE5) it was again omitted, this time together with the preceding it mark. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||
b. 61
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
..
Omission of the '1' digit over the penultimate note in the editions is certainly a result of distraction of the engraver of FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
|||||
b. 61-64
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
..
In A the pedalling is marked only from bar 63. Chopin completed the indications in the previous bars while proofreading FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||
b. 61-62
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
..
It is uncertain which type of accents Chopin had in mind. The signs in A, particularly the second, are clearly shorter than these in the R.H., yet in all analogous figures in bars 7, 15 and 27-28 A displays long accents. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness issues: Long accents |
|||||
b. 62
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |