|
b. 51
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
..
In the main text we give the pedalling added by Chopin in a proofreading of FE (→GE,EE). As an alternative we suggest the indications of FE – also based on Chopin's proofreading – from analogous bar 3. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||
|
b. 52
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
..
In the main text we give the pedalling of FE (→GE,EE), based on Chopin's entry in the proof copy of FE. An alternative suggestion is the version (also being a result of Chopin's proofreading in FE) included in analogous bars 4 and 12. category imprint: Interpretations within context issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||
|
b. 52
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
..
In A Chopin erased the 9th semiquaver and wrote a different one, most probably e category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Corrections in A , GE revisions , Main-line changes |
|||||||||
|
b. 52
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
..
We suggest to add an accent under the 2nd quaver in the bar after Chopin's indications in analogous bars 4 and 12. The accent was also added in EE3 (→EE4) and in GE4 (→GE5) both chords were provided with staccato dots (both revisions correspond to the additions introduced in bar 12). category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
|||||||||
|
b. 53
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
..
We suggest to complete the pedalling on the basis of Chopin's proofreading of FE in analogous bars 5 and 13. The marks were also added in EE4, yet the category imprint: Editorial revisions |
3 in 
sign was put in the middle of the bar (the reviser of