mUltimate Chopin

Op. 10 No 11, Etude in E♭ major

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 2-14

composition: Op. 10 No 11, Etude in E♭ major

Wedges in A

Dots in FE

GE & EE
..

In bars 2-3, 5-6, 10-11 and 13-14 in the main text, we give undeniable wedges written in A (in comparison, Chopin's dots may be seen over the bass notes in bars 1, 5 and analog.). In FE a part of the marks was omitted (in bars 3, 10 and 11) and the rest was interpreted as dots. The changes, according to us, are of a clearly arbitrary nature. GE and EE generally repeat the version of FE, yet they include a dot also in bar 3.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Wedges

b. 2

composition: Op. 10 No 11, Etude in E♭ major

..

In FED there is an added  before a2 in the chord at the beginning of the bar. We also believe that it is advisable in this place, thus we give it in the main text.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FED , Cautionary accidentals

b. 3

composition: Op. 10 No 11, Etude in E♭ major

No  b1 in A (→FE→EE)

Additional b1 w GE
..

The additional b1 note in GE is most probably a mistake. In A Chopin wrote analogous bar 35 too, also without this note.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE

b. 3-4

composition: Op. 10 No 11, Etude in E♭ major

in A

No pedalling in FE (→GE,EE) 

Our suggestion
..

In Chopin's notation, the  marks which are not followed by  usually appear at the end of the pieces. In other situations it is mostly a result of an oversight, yet sometimes it seems that Chopin wanted to emphasise a performance of a given fragment with pedal but without a precise indication of each movement of the leg. This is the situation we are probably facing in this place, as the marks of a pedal depressed on each quaver could simply occupy too much space. In order to avoid any ambiguity, in the main text we add con. In the editions the pedal mark was omitted. Cf. bars 11-12.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: Inaccuracies in FE , No pedal release mark

b. 3-4

composition: Op. 10 No 11, Etude in E♭ major

Slur in A

Slurs in FE (literal reading)

Slurs in GE & EE
..

In FE the slur in bar 3 (last one in the line) ends on the last note in the bar. The mistake contributed to the fact that bar 4 was embraced with a separate slur in GE and EE. In the main text we give the only correct and authentic slur of A. In bars 11-12 the version was faultlessly reproduced in all sources.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions