Pitch
b. 48-49
|
composition: Op. 10 No 11, Etude in E♭ major
..
In A a number of corrections is visible in these bars. In the part of the R.H. Chopin deleted e3 from the 2nd chord (certainly in bar 48, the traces of changes in bar 49 are less visible) and he changed a2 to b2 in the last chord (in both bars). However, at the time of proofreading FE (→GE,EE), he withdrew from the first of the changes. Cf. hesitation concerning the part of the L.H. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Corrections in A , Chopin's hesitations , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||
b. 48-49
|
composition: Op. 10 No 11, Etude in E♭ major
..
Lack of d1 in the 3rd chord in bar 48 in A and deletion of this note in bar 49 prove Chopin's hesitation, as, eventually, he added the note in both bars, while proofreading FE (→GE,EE). Admittedly, the composer had to choose between the correct voice leading and a more graceful and fuller, as far as the sound is concerned, pianistic grip. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Corrections in A , Chopin's hesitations , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||
b. 48-49
|
composition: Op. 10 No 11, Etude in E♭ major
..
In A Chopin did not check the notation of accidentals in these bars. In each of them the returning c4 in the 4th chord is missing, as well as the flats returning e1 in the 5th chord and b3 in the last one. In FE (→GE,EE) all necessary accidentals were added, same as cautionary naturals before c1 and flats before b. In FE, however, the raising e3 to e3 in bar 49 was overlooked, which was corrected in GE and EE, as well as in FED. Moreover, we add a cautionary before a2 in bar 49; the accidental was already added in GE and EE4 together with a less justified cautionary before a. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Errors in FE , Annotations in FED , Omissions to cancel alteration , GE revisions , Errors of A , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||
b. 49
|
composition: Op. 10 No 11, Etude in E♭ major
..
Lack of c1 in the 5th chord is most probably a result of an oversight of the engraver of FE (→GE,EE). Although in FE there are visible traces of corrections in this chord, yet the a note was deleted, probably printed by mistake instead of f. In the main text we give the unequivocal version of A, compliant with analogous bar 48. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Errors resulting from corrections , Terzverschreibung error , Uncertain notes on ledger lines |
|||||
b. 50
|
composition: Op. 10 No 11, Etude in E♭ major
..
The traces of corrections, visible in FE, allow to conclude that b1 as the inner note of the 1st chord in the L.H. was originally in FE1, from which it was passed to GE. In FE (→EE) the note was corrected in the last proofreading to g1, compliant with the notation of A. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Terzverschreibung error , Authentic corrections of FE |