Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
|
b. 70
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
In A both accents in this bar differ significantly in their length, which was not considered in the editions. According to us, the first one, long, refers rather to the upper voice, therefore, in the main text we move it over the chord. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Long accents |
||||||||
|
b. 71
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
Not being certain whether the accent's omission is compatible with Chopin's intention, we suggest a variant solution. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
||||||||
|
b. 73
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
Most probably Chopin added the staccato dot in a proofreading of FE (→GE,EE). In A the reason for its omission could be a mistake whose correction required rewriting the entire bar. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Errors resulting from corrections , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
|
b. 77
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
According to us, omission is the most plausible reason for overlooking the staccato dot in the lower voice in FE (→GE,EE). Cf. the note to the L.H. and bars 79-81. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
||||||||
|
b. 77
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
In the main text we give the wedge, most probably omitted in FE (→GE) due to the engraver's oversight. It is unclear on which basis a dot was added here in EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Wedges |
