data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
b. 62
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
We consider the lack of category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
||||||
b. 62
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
Lack of the wedge in the editions is most probably a result of a mistake committed by the engraver of FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
||||||
b. 62
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
Lack of the ties sustaining the inner notes of the chord and the lower slur (a category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
||||||
b. 62
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
The mark written in A under the first chord has a form of a typical long accent. Despite this fact, in the main text we suggest category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Errors in FE |
||||||
b. 63
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
Lack of the slur in FE (→GE1) is certainly a mistake. The slur was added in EE and subsequent GE,s. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |