b. 1-2
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
In both known copies of EE2, the omitted accents were added by hand. They were also added in the later impressions of EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE |
||||||||
b. 1-11
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
In the main text we give the undoubtedly authentic pedalling of FE (→GE1→GE2,→EE). In later GE the indications were omitted – presumably by mistake – in bars 9-10. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
||||||||
b. 1-2
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
The line, added with panache in FES, may be interpreted as a slur underlining the legato articulation or phrasing. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources |
||||||||
b. 3
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of CLI |
||||||||
b. 3
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
The fingering given in the main text, drawn from FE (→GE), is certainly authentic. In EE it was completed with digits added by Fontana, which, in this case, describes an alternative fingering. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |