b. 12-25
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
The sources differ in the details of notation of accidentals in figures which are repeated in various octaves. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Accidentals in different octaves |
|||||
b. 12-14
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
In FE there are no ties sustaining the upper notes of the octaves in bars 11-12 and 13-14. According to us, the most probable explanation is a misunderstanding at the time of changing the original brief notation of the octaves with the use of 8 under the upper notes for regular notation. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 12-26
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||
b. 12-26
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
The fingering in bars 12-13, 15-21 and 24-26, originating from FE (→GE,EE) and adopted to the main text, must be authentic. category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||
b. 12-25
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
In CLI all octaves in bars 12-22 and 25 are written in an abbreviated form with the digit 8 under the upper notes. In FE the notation was used only in bars 19-22, while in GE1 (→GE2→GE3) in bars 21-22. category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: Abbreviated octaves' notation |