Pitch
b. 7
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
CLI has by mistake an A on the 3rd beat of the bar. Probably it was similar also at the beginning of the bar, yet in this situation the copyist realised the mistake and corrected the erroneous note. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors of CLI |
|||
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
In the manuscripts there are no cautionary naturals before the first two semiquavers in the upper voice. In FE (→GE,EE) there is a sign before e2, while in GE and EE4 a was added also before f2. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals |
|||
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
In CLI there is no returning d2 on the 5th semiquaver in the upper voice. It must be a mistake. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Omissions to cancel alteration , Errors of CLI |
|||
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
On the 4th beat of the bar there is a superfluous before g1 in the manuscripts (cf. bar 4). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Cautionary accidentals |
|||
b. 9
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
Chopin added a cautionary before a1 still in the handwritten base text for FE (→GE,EE). In the situation in which the opening phrase of the Etude appears already for the third time, written from a new line of the text, the sign seems to be superfluous. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Cautionary accidentals |