Verbal indications
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major
..
While proofreading FE (→GE,EE), Chopin slightly reduced the Etude's tempo. Cf. changes of a similar nature in the Etudes in F minor, No. 9 and in A, No. 10. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Metronome tempos , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||||||||||||
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major
..
In the main text we give the title and dedication in the undoubtedly authentic version adopted in FE. The extensions of both the title (in GE and EE) and dedication (in EE) most probably come from the editors. See the Etude in C major, No. 1, bar 1. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Dedications , GE revisions |
|||||||||||||||||||
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: No initial dynamic marking , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||||||||||||
b. 8-13
|
composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||||||||||||
b. 22-23
|
composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major
..
Both dynamic indications in these bars were added by Chopin during a proofreading of FE (→GE,EE). The mark was placed at the beginning of the 2nd crotchet in bar 23, which is either a mistake (cf. bar 9) or an example of a notation's convention, sometimes used by Chopin, according to which the mark is not placed at the beginning, yet in the middle of its range of validity (cf. the Etude in C major, No. 1, bar 45). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE , Centrally placed marks |