Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 61-63

composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major

Slur in A, possible interpretation

Contextual interpretation of A (→FEGE,EE3)

Slurs in EE4

Our suggestion

..

Lack of slurs in bars 61-62 is undoubtedly Chopin's oversight in A, related to the transition to a new page – the slurs begin from a new page and the first of them (in bar 63) suggests continuation from the previous bar. In bars 62-63 FE (→GE,EE3) have a slur resulting from the notation of A. In the main text we consider the slur in bars 62-63 and suggest to add the slur in bar 61, in accordance with the slurring of analogous bars.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions

b. 61

composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major

in A (→FEEE,GE1GE2)

No marking in GE3 (→GE4)

..

Omission of  in GE3 (→GE4) is probably a mistake.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE

b. 62-66

composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major

No slurs in A (→FEGE1)

Slur in EE

Our suggestion

..

Less precise notation of the last appearance of the main theme of the Etude is revealed by, e.g., lack of some of the slurs in the part of the L.H. We suggest to complete them after bars 15-22, which are most accurately written in this respect. Some of the suggested additions were already introduced – probably on the basis of comparison with analogous places – in EE (in bar 64) and GE2 (→GE3GE4) – in bar 66. 

category imprint: Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions , GE revisions

b. 63

composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major

Semibreve in A & GE

Minim in FE (→EE3)

Minim in EE4

..

The version of FE (→EE3) is probably a result of misunderstanding of the notation of A. The later change of notation into two-part writing is an arbitrary invention of the reviser of EE4, which is of no significance in this context (cf. bar 31).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions

b. 64-66

composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major

..

The E1-E octaves at the beginning of bars 64 and 66 are briefly written with the digit 8.

category imprint: Source & stylistic information

issues: Abbreviated octaves' notation