



b. 63-66
|
composition: Op. 45, Prelude in C♯ minor
..
In the main text we adopt the more precise indication of FE1 (→EE). The partially lacking dashes indicating the scope of crescendo in FE2 is certainly a result of the engraver's negligence. It is possible that their total absence in GE is also an error (cf. the remark concerning bars 55-58). According to us, both the earlier placement of crescendo in GE and the placement of the indication above the upper stave in FE (→EE) may have resulted from the lack of space between the staves. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
|||||||||
b. 63-65
|
composition: Op. 45, Prelude in C♯ minor
..
We consider the accents which are only in GE as an enhancement introduced into [A2]. category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||||
b. 63-66
|
composition: Op. 45, Prelude in C♯ minor
..
It is hard to consider the difference in the placement of category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions |
|||||||||
b. 64
|
composition: Op. 45, Prelude in C♯ minor
..
The sources differ in the presence of cautionary accidentals: category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Cautionary accidentals |
|||||||||
b. 65
|
composition: Op. 45, Prelude in C♯ minor
..
Lack of category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |