Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 59-60

composition: Op. 45, Prelude in C♯ minor

No markings in FE (→EE1)

Pedalling in GE & EE2

..

The pedalling, present only in GE (and EE2), is probably an element of a slightly more diligent preparation of [A2] by Chopin. 

category imprint: Differences between sources

b. 60

composition: Op. 45, Prelude in C♯ minor

dim. in FE (→EE)

dimin. in GE

Our suggestion

..

We give the indication dim. after GE, which is probably based on the later autograph. The abbreviation dimin., used in GE, was probably generally used by this editor; therefore, we replace it with dim., an abbreviation which is commonly applied nowadays and more frequently used by Chopin.

category imprint: Differences between sources

b. 60

composition: Op. 45, Prelude in C♯ minor

..

In FE1 there are no naturals before the 5th and 7th quavers (both are necessary in the layout adopted in this edition). The signs were added in FE2. The correct text is also in EE and GE (with one natural f). 

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , Omission of current key accidentals , FE revisions

b. 61-62

composition: Op. 45, Prelude in C♯ minor

One slur in FE1 (→EE) & GE

Two slurs in FE2

..

In FE1 (→EE), despite the transition to a new page, the slur in bar 62 is a continuation of the slur in bar 61. However, in FE2 the slurs are separated, which is certainly a mistake. GE has a continuous slur.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE

b. 62-65

composition: Op. 45, Prelude in C♯ minor

Slurs in FE1

FE2 & EE

Reconstruction of [A2]

..

The slurring in bars 62-63 may be considered as authentic both in FE1 and GE. The first of them were then recreated in FE2 and EE, yet with a change of layout – slurs in bars 63-65 are placed below the notes. According to the editors, it is highly unlikely that it follows Chopin's notation. On the basis of that, it may be supposed that also the slurs in GE, which are running under the notes, were placed over the notes in the autograph. In the main text we give the alleged notation of [A2].

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Placement of markings , GE revisions , FE revisions